True Cafeteria Buddhism

October 24th, 2010

Looked at one way, it makes no difference at all what the Buddha said or meant, for example by the various terms in dependent arising.  As long as we understand the general principles of how we’re creating this effervescent self, and how we run afoul of it, it doesn’t matter much if we translate it into modern terms, as long as the tools for seeing the process in our own lives — that is, meditation and mindfulness — are still sharpened by our concepts.

Looked at from another angle, though, failure to understand with precision what the Buddha said, and why, may mean that we miss key insights, or, worse, misunderstand in ways that have us expending a lot of energy on paths that won’t take us where we want to go — efficiently, or not at all.

The assumption that there was no historical person that originated this way of seeing leads to willingness to accept that it’s a fuzzy, disorganized insight from which one can pick and choose because we are all members of the committee that came up with the general directions.  It is willingness to look for evidence of consistency, the assumption that it may be there, that provides the fuel for the search, the persistence to stick with the difficult task of sorting out what’s added from what’s original, and to work at understanding the context and therefore the terms, to see if it all fits.

6 Responses to “True Cafeteria Buddhism”

  1. Jayarava says:

    Words to live by :-)

  2. Today was the first time I heard “effervescent” applied to self. May I ask the origin of that use? Is it a poetic translation of some Tibetan/Pali/Sanskrit term? Or did some teacher use it, and it became common place?

  3. star says:

    I would not be surprised if I’d read “effervescent self” somewhere and retained it, Sabio, but my memory is not the sort that records where I pick things up, sorry. It’s a nice phrase though.

  4. Yeah, I like the ring of the expression, but “effervescent” kind of means “bubbly” to me or “sparkly” so maybe the connotation is like the ideas in mind that bubble up and the transient nature of a bubble (and of our many selves).

  5. star says:

    Yes, and of many bubbles arising, rising, disappearing, in a constant stream.

  6. @ star
    It is a fantastic analogy. You stole it from someone else, and I shall steal it from thee without any guilt. Oh the beauty of Buddhist ethics! smile

RSS feed for comments on this post. And trackBack URL.

Leave a Reply